So
this week I am running out of my inspiration and honestly had no idea what to
write, but I decided to search for more book about women in government.
The
first position is It Takes a Candidate Why Women Don't Run for Office by Jennifer
L. Lawless, Richard Logan Fox. Obviously I haven’t read it yet, so I found a
description of the book and in proves to be quite promising. So here it is “This
important work constitutes a systematic, nationwide empirical account of the
effects of gender on political ambition. Based on data from the Citizen
Political Ambition Study, a national survey of 3,800 "potential candidates"
conducted by the authors, it relates these findings: --Women, even at the
highest levels of professional accomplishment, are significantly less likely
than men to demonstrate ambition to run for elective office. --Women are less
likely than men to be recruited to run for office. --Women are less likely than
men to consider themselves "qualified" to run for office. --Women are
less likely than men to express a willingness to run for a future office.
According to the authors, this gender gap in political ambition persists across
generations, despite contemporary society's changing attitudes towards female
candidates. While other treatments of gender in the electoral process focus on
candidates and office holders, It Takes a Candidate makes a unique contribution
to political studies by focusing on the earlier stages of the candidate
emergence process and on how gender affects the decision to seek elective
office.”
The
second one is It Still Takes A Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office by
Jennifer L. Lawless, Richard L. Fox. “It
Still Takes A Candidate serves as the only systematic, nationwide empirical
account of the manner in which gender affects political ambition. Based on data
from the Citizen Political Ambition Panel Study, a national survey conducted of
almost 3,800 “potential candidates” in 2001 and a second survey of more than
2,000 of these same individuals in 2008, Jennifer L. Lawless and Richard L. Fox
find that women, even in the highest tiers of professional accomplishment, are
substantially less likely than men to demonstrate ambition to seek elective
office. Women are less likely than men to be recruited to run for office. They
are less likely than men to think they are qualified to run for office. And
they are less likely than men to express a willingness to run for office in the
future. This gender gap in political ambition persists across generations and
over time. Despite cultural evolution and society’s changing attitudes toward
women in politics, running for public office remains a much less attractive and
feasible endeavor for women than men.”
The
third one is Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates and Voters in U.S.
Elections by Richard Seltzer, Jody Newman, Melissa Voorhees Leighton. “Though
women constitute 52 percent of US voters, only 10 percent of the members of
Congress and one of the 50 state governors are women. This book presents
research and analysis on women as both candidates and voters in US politics,
using numerous empirical sources of data.”
I guess that’s it for today. I’m really hoping
to get inspired and start working on the first chapter of my BA Thesis. Wish me
luck.
K.



I find your bibliography truly impressive! I guess with this amount of data you'll be able to provide your readers with a sound background as well as paint a good picture of a fictional woman-candidate or woman-in-office.
OdpowiedzUsuńNotice - your second book in this post It Still Takes A Candidate is a revised version of the first one, so don't treat them as two separate books ok?